Former Auxiliary Officer Sues Haymarket

Glen P,

In your post above, you stated, "And, I am sure that if the payments had continued to fall behind that the Town Council would have taken further action." Well you were wrong! See below.

Some Facts about our current mayor:

1. In the months that were saved electonically, she was behind in her rent in excess of 12 days 12 separate times. I listed in excess of 12 days because this is when the LEASE states she should be charged an extra $40 for being late after the 1st of the month.

2. The Mayor never paid a late fee that she should have. I guess she figured that since she was on the town council, she didn't have to pay the fees as stated in the lease. The Town Council did not vote on this. She just ignored the lease! Therefore according to my calculations, she still owes the town $480!

3. At one point the Mayor was 10 months behind in her rent!!! See invoice 8/1/2004. And you have the audacity to say that someone on council would have taken action?!?! I guess they only do that when you are 1 year behind in your payments!

4. Her lease was to continue until March 1st 2005. The council let her out of the lease early. I can only assume that is due to the fact that they realized that they weren't going to be receiving any more payments so why bother.

5. Most Importantly! I have to agree with Proffit in the article. The Mayor was taking money monthly for while serving on the council and FAILING to pay the town the money that it was due for her rent. She could have at least signed those payments directly over to the town if she was having financial troubles. (It appears she did that the last month.)

Residents - This person was accepting money from the town government at the same time she owned that same government money. THIS IS WHAT SHE TRIED TO HIDE FROM THE ABOVE FOIA and cost the town a lawsuit!

Is this the Mayor you want running your town?

Just remember - Always on Guard

So what! Now you expect the taxpayers to pay for a FOIA that the residents did not ask for. You ordered the FOIA, you pay for it! I doubt that a FOIA is in the 2006 or 2007 Town Of Haymarket Budget. So hoss out your own personal checkbook cause whoever you owe for that FOIA is expecting full payment forthwith!

And - ABSOLUTELY, I DID NOT ASK FOR A FOIA; once again you have lied!

The FOIA wouldn't have cost the taxpayers any money had the Mayor responded and not tried to conceal the truth or put it off until after the election!

And, how did I lie?

If you want to talk about lying, lets talk about the Potomac News Article:

In an e-mail to Proffitt from Stutz dated April 27, Stutz notes that Proffitt's request was not filed by the town until April 13.

If that were the case, the town's response would have been within the five work day period.

However, Proffitt's original request was stamped April 12, a town clerk confirmed Friday.

Ohh and PS: Tell WatchDog to spell my name right and be sure to take your medicine today!

The Balance is $0.00.

Charlie, now, be a nice boy, take out your personal checkbook and write the check for the invoice or bill for the FOIA and be done with it.

I assure you that you have no knowledge of medicine that I may or may not be taking; once again you have lied!

Glen,

You see when I state something, I back it up with facts!

You have yet to do that. So please, tell me how I have lied. Otherwise, please keep quiet!

Balance to the Town of Haymarket says $0.00. I am certain that the taxpayers have no interest in paying for you ordering a FOIA!

Like I said, Charlie, you have no knowledge of any medicine that I may or may not be taking. Therefore, you lied when you said for me to be sure I take my medicine today.

Now, be a nice boy, take out your checkbook and pay for the FOIA that you ordered and be done with it. I am sure payment is expected!

If you read the lease, she did not adhere to the terms. So there is a balance, and proof to back that up. Or is there a conspiracy to cover it up. Is Sheila involved? What a circle you run with. GlenP you need to see what the definition of truth is, because you live in fairy land, and you are the king fairy. And by the way I have seen you get prescriptions, you do take medication, Mr. Proffitt is correct about you needing it. Now we know the truth about Ms. Jarboe, she is just as bad as Stutz.

Glen,

By making a statement, be sure to take your medicine. That is not a lie! You crack me up that you actually believe the stuff you spew. Using your same messed up logic this would be a lie:

Glen be sure to drive to the police dept tomorrow and see the Chief. You would say that is a lie because you don't intend to drive there tomorrow. Do you see how ridiculous your logic is?

Now I see why you have the most posts on this board! You have nothing else better to do.

Let me know if you would like me to have the webmaster post all of the back and forth emails to the Mayor about my FOIA request prior to the suit being filed so that you can see where I tried to handle this prior to litigation. I doubt you want that though. You never really want the truth. You kinda enjoy your alternate reality.

PS: You wrote I lied prior to the medicine comment. So please tell me what I lied about? Just FYI, I don't lie!

Charlie, re read 'Ah Baloney, Charlie! ACTUALLY, YAWN HO HUM! posted above.

I could care less how you conduct your business; its none of my business.

Now, take out your personal checkbook, you owe someone for a FOIA, and I bet (now there is a term you should understand) he or she is expecting payment forthwith!

Incidently, you lied again; in one of the subtopics you wrote,'Glen - You are an idiot!'. Charlie that is slander and I am not an idiot......I earned a Bachelor Of Science degree in Business Administration.....graduated 'cum laude'.

I guess if Charlie pays for his FOIA request you will pay off Pam Stutz's debt to the town. His request is within 30 days, how old is her debt? I think she owes interest. Can she afford that.

The history of Bill Gates and his rise to the be one of, if not the richest man on Earth has not always been one of getting rich without problems and setbacks. I post this as an example to show that business is not always lucrative at first and as I have written before ‘tolerance is allowed’ and it should be. Its takes time to develop a business.

‘At the age of fourteen Bill Gates and his programming buddy thought up the idea for a traffic counting computer which would later be named 'Traf- o-Data' and earn them 20 000 dollars. But when word got around that the computers were being sold out of a basement by a couple of teens the business fell through. Gates also worked as a Congressional Page and at a programming company called 'TRW'.’ Source: http://inventors.about.com/gi/dynamic/offsite.htm?site=http://members.tripod.com/%7ECodim/work.html

- Charlie, in case you do not understand why I posted the above, its because within the short story it speaks of the reason why ‘Taf-o-Data’ failed; it was not because of its capability, but because of the bad publicity! Exactly what you are attempting at your selfish and nosey nonsense by having your ridiculous FOIA findings posted as an editorial in a newspaper. And then on a website. -

In its earlier years, Microsoft was involved in its first string of lawsuits, both by and against the company. In one incident:

Microsoft’s had a contract with a company called MITS to make “best efforts” to sell Microsoft BASIC rather than Microsoft selling software directly to customers. Shortly thereafter, there were so many copies of the language floating around that MITS no longer tried to sell the program.

Gates’ father, who was a lawyer himself, assured Bill that he could win if he sued to retrieve the rights to BASIC. Gates and Allen agreed to let the suit against Pertec (MITS was sold to Pertec) to arbitration. But arbitration moved at a snail’s pace, and Pertec withheld payments until a decision was reached. In its earlier years, Microsoft nearly went broke:

Gates is quoted, ‘”They were trying to starve us to death. We couldn’t even pay our lawyer. They tried to get us to settle, and we almost did, it was that bad. The arbitrator took nine months to issue his damn opinion. But when it was all over, the arbitrator ripped them apart for what they had done.”’

In Microsoft’s early years, Gates could have borrowed money from his parents, but he chose not to.

Source: ‘Bill Gates Speaks: Insight from the World’s Greatest Entrepreneur’

Hey Charlie, It is a well-known fact that for the first three years many small businesses struggle.

So you want to waste our time and tell us why YOU ARE GOING TO ALL THE TROUBLE TO TELLS US WHY the Red Rooster was struggling!!! I bet your MO is all about politics!

I guess the post above is to show how qualified Bill Gates is to run the town of Haymarket. I think so to. Please everyone since he is not on the ballot, please write him in, he will get the job done. Heck he is endorsed by GlenP, that goes a long way. Idiot.

I wouldn't mind a Bill Gates for mayor. So long as he's not as long winded and redundant as mr. glenp.

I am knew to this site, but I have quickly noticed a thin line between the ones that support the town and police department and those that do not. When does it stop? Everyone has a right to speak their opinion, but after awhile I think personal feeling's start to cloud the light of the real problems and issues. I don't take sides on here and like I mentioned before on another post, I agree with many posts and disagree with others. I have nothing against anyone and I find it easier to review this site with an open mind when I have nothing to gain or lose by whatever is posted.

it is not so much a matter of personal feelings, but a matter of the mountain of lies and cover-ups that there is public proof of and people choose to ignore it and allow the same group of people to continue to run our town. these lawsuits that are filed against the town because of the unprofessional and crooked leadership that we call our mayor and council, are paid for by the residents. it might make some people bitter.

Lisa, write in Bill Gates, but please be sure to flip the lever for Pam Stutz for Mayor; thank you, this is not a paid for political announcement.